Main Menu
|
Samsung SATA 120 GB Hard Drive (cont.)Performance: For performance, I am going to bench test Samsung's SATA 120 GB drive against a Maxtor SATA 120 GB drive, model Y3PEGJLE. The Maxtor drive is also a 7200 RPM drive with 8 MB cache. Its access time is 9.3 ms, so from specifications, it appears the Samsung should perform a bit better. The drives are blank. I am using Windows 2003 which is installed on another drive; therefore, OS activity accessing the drive is minimized. First up, the Samsung drive tested with Sandra's file system benchmark.
The performance looks okay, I really expected more with the access time. Let's find out how it stacks up versus the Maxtor SATA drive.
Maxtor's drive has a faster read, whooping Samsung. The access time is great. Samsung's drive did post faster write times. The problem with Sandra, is that I don't have a lot of options to test the drive. Therefore, I grabbed another program, PassMark. PassMark allows me to specify a lot of different settings with testing the drive. The first settings were with a block size of 4MB. I ran a sequential 50/50 write/read. For the second run, I did what PassMark calls a Workgroup setting. It is a 80/20 random/sequential 70/30 read/write.
Maxtor's SATA hard drive was again the winner with speed. I am starting to believe that the Maxtor drive will suit you better with speed. The next test is with a smaller block size. I ran the same tests as above with a 32KB block size. A bunch of smaller files are always read and written slower. Normally, you will probably be reading and writing small files.
Again, the Maxtor drive came out on top. This time increasing its lead on the Samsung. One thought I had was that the Samsung might perform better with files on the drive. This would causing the head to move a bit on the drive instead of being near the inner track. That might help a drive with faster seeks times. Therefore, I put 40GB of data on each drive, and ran the Sandra test. First up the Samsung.
Looks like the Samsung improves a bit with more data on the drive. Maybe my theory is right.
According to the over all stat, Samsung finally won a category in the SATA drive wars. Looking at the break down, the Maxtor still presents itself as a quicker drive. I ran each test 3 times. For some reason, the top number was the same each time for the Samsung and Maxtor tests. Break down numbers varied by one or two MB/sec and I took the middle results. Both drives are very quiet while running. This is important for those that want a quiet case. As for heat, I found the Samsung drive to be 2C cooler than the Maxtor drive; Samsung's first real advantage. I checked a couple of points on the outside of the drive to determine this, of course this isn't inside the drive where it counts. One more thing, Maxtor had about 3GB more space after the initial format. This is a big plus to Maxtor for we are buying space not only speed. Conclusion: Even though the Maxtor had a stated slower access time, it flew. While I don't like Maxtor as much as Samsung, the drive was faster. If you are looking to improve your system performance, Maxtor's SATA drive is a quicker drive than Samsung's SATA. To really improve performance, always go with a RAID setup. The reason I don't like Maxtor is because I have seen way too many fail for my taste. I have had a Samsung ATA 133 hard drive for over a year now and have had no issues. Only time will tell with both these SATA drives, for I have had them less than 3 weeks each. Pros:
Cons:
Ratings: Good (Ratings Possible: Terrible, Very Bad, Bad, Fair, Good, Very Good, Excellent) |






